Bitcoin‑Backed Preferreds Challenge T‑Bills

• My 'briefing notes' summarize the content of podcast episodes; they do not reflect my own views.
• They contain (1) a summary of podcast content, (2) potential information gaps, and (3) some speculative views on wider Bitcoin implications.
• Pay attention to broadcast dates (I often summarize older episodes)
• Some episodes I summarize may be sponsored: don't trust, verify, if the information you are looking for is to be used for decision-making.

Summary

The July 23, 2025 episode of MSTR True North explains how a 16% leverage ratio lets MicroStrategy withstand an 88% Bitcoin drawdown while expanding its 67,770‑coin treasury. The panel introduces Stretch (STRC), a zero‑duration preferred pegged at $100 with a 9% monthly coupon, positioning it as a cash‑management rival to short‑dated Treasuries. Unrated status currently blocks institutional demand, but widespread STRC adoption could realign fixed‑income markets.

Take-Home Messages

1. Leverage Headroom: A 16% ratio allows an 88% Bitcoin drop before liabilities exceed assets.
2. STRC Design: The $100‑pegged, 9% coupon preferred targets cash‑equivalent investors using Bitcoin collateral.
3. Rating Roadblock: Lack of credit‑agency ratings restricts pension and insurance participation.
4. Convertible Exit: Retiring $8 billion of converts would lift collateral coverage to 11.8× and simplify the capital stack.
5. Treasury Displacement: Widespread STRC uptake could divert corporate cash from short‑dated Treasuries to Bitcoin‑backed paper.

Overview

Panelists open by quantifying MicroStrategy’s durability, noting that 16% leverage permits an 88% Bitcoin drawdown before insolvency. They stress that at‑the‑market equity issuance nearly doubled assets to $72 billion since January 2025, albeit with dilution. This financing model underwrites further Bitcoin accumulation while maintaining coverage ratios.

Attention shifts to STRC, a zero‑duration preferred pegged at $100 and resetting its 9% coupon monthly. Issued inside a narrow $99–$101 band, it aims to replicate T‑bill stability yet deliver higher yield. Panelists describe peg tools - coupon resets, issuance windows, and cumulative dividends - as safeguards against volatility.

They then examine plans to retire $8 billion in convertible debt, which would raise Bitcoin coverage from 7.7× to 11.8× across remaining preferreds. Simplifying the capital stack is framed as boosting credit quality and reducing gamma‑hedging pressures. However, panelists warn that convert holders may react defensively, affecting liquidity.

Finally, the discussion turns to structural hurdles. Without investment‑grade ratings, STRC and STRF (Strife) remain confined to hedge funds and yield‑seeking retail. Panel members predict that once rating agencies approve segregated‑collateral structures, Bitcoin‑backed preferreds could compete directly with short‑dated Treasuries for corporate cash.

Stakeholder Perspectives

1. Regulators: Scrutinize systemic risk if unrated Bitcoin‑backed credit scales rapidly.
2. Corporate Treasurers: Balance 9% yield against accounting complexity and collateral unfamiliarity.
3. Rating Agencies: Demand segregated Bitcoin pools and long‑run volatility data before granting grades.
4. Fixed‑Income Investors: Seek higher coupons but require confidence in peg durability and recovery frameworks.
5. Bitcoin Advocates: View STRC as evidence that Bitcoin can anchor mainstream credit markets.

Implications and Future Outlook

If STRC maintains its $100 peg through the next volatility spike, confidence in Bitcoin‑backed cash substitutes will rise, accelerating corporate uptake. A peg failure would chill market appetite and invite stricter oversight, delaying any shift away from Treasuries. Thus, near‑term performance will set the narrative for Bitcoin‑collateralized credit.

Rating‑agency acceptance of segregated‑collateral structures stands as the pivotal catalyst for institutional demand. Investment‑grade marks would unlock pension and insurance capital, deepening liquidity and compressing yields. Regulators may then confront broader questions about collateral standards and sovereign‑bond demand.

Should STRC displace a measurable share of corporate cash from T‑bills, U.S. Treasury financing costs could edge higher. Policymakers would need to recalibrate debt‑issuance strategies while monitoring new Bitcoin‑linked risk channels. Energy and custody stakeholders might also benefit as demand for secure coin storage and efficient mining offsets grows.

Some Key Information Gaps

1. How resilient is MicroStrategy’s 16% leverage ratio under prolonged Bitcoin bear markets? Quantifying multi‑year stress tolerance guides investor risk models and informs regulatory oversight.
2. To what extent does continuous at‑the‑market issuance suppress mNAV expansion? Clarifying this dynamic shapes capital‑raising strategy and option‑market liquidity.
3. Which quantitative benchmarks would satisfy rating agencies for Bitcoin‑backed preferred shares? Meeting these metrics could unlock vast pension and insurance demand.
4. Will STRC’s peg enforcement mechanisms remain effective during extreme volatility? Product credibility depends on consistent peg maintenance, influencing broader adoption.
5. Could widespread STRC uptake materially shift demand from short‑dated Treasuries? Assessing macro impact informs fiscal planning and monetary‑policy responses.

Broader Implications for Bitcoin

Parallel Credit Ecosystems

Bitcoin‑backed preferreds foreshadow a parallel credit market that operates outside traditional sovereign collateral frameworks. As issuers prove peg stability and secure ratings, corporations may allocate liquidity into these instruments, reducing reliance on government debt. This trend could diversify funding channels but also complicate central‑bank policy transmission.

Custody and Infrastructure Expansion

Institutional acceptance of Bitcoin collateral will spur demand for insured, regulation‑compliant custody solutions. Custodians, insurers, and auditors must collaborate on standardized risk frameworks to support large‑scale holdings. Success here sets precedent for broader asset‑tokenization initiatives anchored by robust on‑chain proof‑of‑reserves.

Regulatory Convergence Pressure

Cross‑jurisdictional issuance of Bitcoin‑backed paper will pressure regulators to harmonize treatment of digital collateral. Divergent rules risk fragmenting liquidity and raising compliance costs, whereas coordinated standards could foster global adoption. Policymakers who craft clear, technology‑neutral guidelines will shape competitive advantage in emerging credit markets.