Bitcoin’s 2025 Plateau: Liquidity Transmission, Treasury Volatility, and Adoption Signals

• My 'briefing notes' summarize the content of podcast episodes; they do not reflect my own views.
• They contain (1) a summary of podcast content, (2) potential information gaps, and (3) some speculative views on wider Bitcoin implications.
• Pay attention to broadcast dates (I often summarize older episodes)
• Some episodes I summarize may be sponsored: don't trust, verify, if the information you are looking for is to be used for decision-making.

Summary

The October 01, 2025 episode of the Green Candle podcast features Nik Bhatia assessing whether conditions justify a parabolic phase. Bhatia separates macro liquidity from native Bitcoin dynamics, arguing that refinancing waves and falling Treasury volatility matter more than small rate cuts. He frames price formation around multi-decade network adoption while weighing U.S. policy shifts on collateral and stablecoins.

Take-Home Messages

1. Halving Model Drift: 2025 underperformance relative to 2017/2021 weakens reliance on four-year cycle heuristics.
2. Liquidity Transmission: Usable liquidity hinges on credit creation and refinancing, not headline policy rate cuts.
3. Treasury Volatility: Declining rates volatility aligns more reliably with Bitcoin risk-on behavior than yield levels alone.
4. Adoption Horizon: Network effects unfold over decades, tempering near-term parabolic expectations.
5. Policy Rails: Stablecoin legislation can expand dollar rails without a retail CBDC, shaping demand pathways.

Overview

Nik Bhatia argues that recent price action lacks the momentum and volatility signature typical of prior parabolic advances. He notes a rangebound market following a failed summer breakout and cautions against anchoring to halving-cycle lore. The thrust is that conditions have not yet aligned for reflexive upside.

He separates the idea of “lower rates” from “abundant liquidity,” emphasizing that credit creation and refinancing drive transmission. In his view, modest policy cuts do little unless lending standards ease and term structures support refinancing. This reframing moves focus from headline rates to actual balance-sheet capacity.

Treasury market structure sits at the center of his macro read. Bhatia contends that calmer Treasury volatility does more to unlock risk budgets than mechanically lower yields. The implication is that volatility, not level, governs allocator behavior across assets.

On longer horizons he returns to network effects and multi-decade diffusion as the primary valuation anchor. He links U.S. policy priorities - collateral attraction and industrial capacity in chips and data centers - to capital flows that can intersect with Bitcoin and stablecoins. He views a retail CBDC as unlikely near term, with stablecoin legislation serving as the operative dollar rail.

Stakeholder Perspectives

1. Asset allocators: Reweight models toward Treasury volatility and credit/refinancing proxies rather than cycle heuristics.
2. Traders and market-makers: Track realized volatility, funding conditions, and supply overhangs to calibrate breakout risk.
3. Regulators and policymakers: Balance stablecoin rail expansion with financial-stability safeguards and sanctions compliance.
4. Banks and lenders: Align underwriting and term structures to support refinancing waves that transmit policy into liquidity.
5. Mining and infrastructure firms: Plan capex against rangebound scenarios while monitoring policy-driven demand channels.

Implications and Future Outlook

If Treasury volatility trends lower and refinancing broadens, allocators gain risk capacity that can support a durable up-leg. Under that path, halving-centric narratives give way to macro-linked playbooks keyed to term structure and credit spreads. The shift favors systematic frameworks over cycle folklore.

If rates volatility stays elevated or lenders remain tight, consolidation likely persists and parabolic bets underperform. Stablecoin policy clarity may still deepen on-ramps, but without liquidity transmission the impact skews incremental. In this regime, execution quality and inventory management dominate returns.

Across scenarios, multi-decade adoption remains the anchor and sets expectations for uneven progress. Institutions will demand auditable signals that link user growth, liquidity, and market microstructure. That demand creates a premium on transparent metrics and repeatable risk processes.

Some Key Information Gaps

1. Which Treasury volatility measures have the strongest causal link to Bitcoin returns across horizons? Identifying robust metrics would let allocators map macro conditions to allocation decisions with fewer false signals.
2. Which credit and refinancing metrics most reliably translate policy rate moves into net liquidity for Bitcoin demand? Clear transmission proxies would separate benign easing from crisis-driven liquidity that distorts signals.
3. How can analysts detect when halving-cycle heuristics lose predictive power for price formation? Reliable tests would reduce model risk and prevent overfitting to legacy narratives.
4. What governance and compliance frameworks make stablecoins a durable U.S. dollar rail without a retail CBDC? Sound rules could expand payment optionality while preserving financial stability and lawful use.
5. What adoption milestones and datasets best map network growth to price over multi-decade horizons? Auditable indicators would align institutional mandates with measurable adoption progress.

Broader Implications for Bitcoin

Liquidity Metrics Over Narratives

A shift from cycle stories to measurable macro signals will standardize how institutions approach Bitcoin exposure. As Treasury volatility and credit transmission become primary inputs, discretionary narratives will carry less weight in allocation committees. This reweighting could accelerate professionalization of analytics, risk limits, and reporting across asset managers.

Stablecoin Rails as Policy Infrastructure

If stablecoins expand as dollar rails absent a retail CBDC, payment intermediation will migrate toward regulated private issuers. That configuration can widen access to dollar liquidity while keeping central banks at an arm’s-length from retail data. Over the medium term, this architecture may tighten links between Bitcoin liquidity, dollar funding markets, and compliance technology.

Adoption Benchmarks for Public Finance

Auditable adoption metrics can inform reserve and treasury strategies for municipalities and sovereign entities. As data improves, treasurers may pilot small Bitcoin allocations tied to clear triggers such as user growth, market depth, and volatility regimes. This incremental approach could normalize rule-based participation without politicizing balance sheets.

Education and Model Governance

As institutions adopt macro-linked frameworks, curricula and certifications will integrate Bitcoin analytics with fixed-income and credit tooling. Model governance will require documented limits, validation, and scenario testing akin to traditional markets. This convergence can lower operational risk and support broader fiduciary adoption.